Why you possibly can belief Digital Digital camera World
Our skilled reviewers spend hours testing and evaluating services and products so you possibly can select the most effective for you. Learn how we check.
Roll the clock again to April 1999, earlier than the appearance of mainstream digital SLRs, and Canon launched the EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III for its EOS 35mm movie cameras. Means again then, the Mk III was an ‘enchancment’ over the Mk II, which was launched 4 years earlier, however didn’t impress me. The fundamental model had a sluggish, noisy and fundamental electrical autofocus motor. There was no full-time guide focus override and the main focus ring in addition to the entrance aspect rotated throughout autofocus, which impaired dealing with. There was additionally no optical picture stabilization, no weather-seals, a cheap-feeling construct and also you had to purchase the hood individually as an ‘non-obligatory further’. There was additionally a barely extra up-market USM (UltraSonic Motor) model however autofocus was nonetheless sluggish and had the identical dealing with disappointments. Quick-forward to 2025 and the brand new RF version looks as if an nearly actual copy of the previous Mk III EF lens. It’s similar within the variety of optical components and teams, the aperture vary, the essential electrical autofocus system, the dearth of stabilization and the dealing with flaws. It additionally shares the identical minimal focus distance, magnification ratio, filter thread and makes use of the identical ET-60 hood, once more offered individually. I don’t suppose it’ll be incomes a spot as one of many greatest Canon telephoto lenses or the greatest Canon RF lenses for EOS R system cameras. After greater than 1 / 4 of a century, it’s onerous to see what’s new and improved on this RF lens.

Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6: Specs
|
Mount choices |
Canon RF |
|
Lens building |
13 components in 9 teams |
|
Angle of view |
32.1-8.25 levels |
|
Diaphragm blades |
7 |
|
Minimal aperture |
f/32-45 |
|
Minimal focus distance |
1.5m |
|
Most magnification |
0.06x (W) 0.25x (T) |
|
Filter dimension |
58mm |
|
Dimensions |
71x146mm / 2.8×5.7″ |
|
Weight |
507g / 1.12lb |
Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6: Value
The final time I used to be fully underwhelmed by a Canon 75-300mm lens was again in 2009, once I examined the EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III after it had already been on sale for 10 years. On the time, it had a listing value of £280 within the UK. The place I stay, the listing value of the brand new RF version is barely any completely different, at $TBA / £289 / AU$399, in order that’s no less than one thing in its favor, contemplating how a lot all the pieces else appears to have gone up in value over the past 16 years. It’s remarkably cheap for an own-brand Canon RF lens, with a value that’s in the identical ballpark as some finances primes, together with the RF 16mm f/2.8 STM and RF 28mm f/2.8 STM, though the superb RF 50mm f/1.8 STM prices considerably much less to purchase. As I’d count on the extra refined Canon RF 100-400mm f/5.6-8 IS USM full-frame appropriate zoom and even the APS-C format Canon RF-S 55-210mm f/5-7.1 IS STM are pricier to purchase.
Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6: Design & Dealing with
Having presumably labored the purpose about all of the similarities between this new RF lens and the Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III from manner again in 1999, I received’t repeat them. Let’s begin contemporary and take the design and dealing with on their very own advantage. Whereas many mirrorless zoom lenses have apertures that shrink to smaller values on the lengthy finish, just like the spectacular but nonetheless compact and reasonably priced Canon RF 100-400mm f/5.6-8 IS USM, this 75-300mm lens has a extra DSLR-friendly f/4-5.6 score, higher suiting the autofocus talents of entry-level DSLR cameras. That’s no dangerous factor, as the complete further f/cease in velocity on the lengthy finish in contrast with the RF 100-400mm lens makes it simpler to freeze motion beneath low lighting situations, with out bumping up your digicam’s ISO setting as a lot.
Okay, I stated I wouldn’t however I’ll. I ponder if the optical design is identical as that of the EF lens, because it has the identical variety of components and teams, minimal focus distance, most magnification ratio and so forth. The RF lens is bodily about an inch longer, which may account for the extra distance required because of the EOS R system’s lack of a reflex mirror meeting. On the different finish of the worth scale, I’ve seen one thing related within the form of the Canon RF 400mm f/2.8L IS USM lens, which is basically the identical because the older EF lens however with an RF mount adapter constructed into the again finish.

Both manner, the RF 75-300mm is a significantly compact and light-weight lens that’s ideally suited to entry-level EOS R system cameras. Within the full-frame camp, that features the EOS RP and EOS R8, whereas the lens has a boosted ‘efficient’ zoom vary of 120-480mm on APS-C format EOS R system cameras. It’s subsequently unlucky that the lens doesn’t characteristic optical picture stabilization. Digital camera-shake is an ever-present hazard when taking pictures handheld with telephoto lenses, and neither of the full-frame our bodies I’ve talked about have IBIS (In-Physique Picture Stabilization), and the one APS-C physique that presently has IBIS is the EOS R7.

Typical of the breed, this budget-friendly, variable-aperture telephoto zoom has an inside barrel that bodily extends as you stretch from the shortest to the longest zoom setting. That’s solely to be anticipated and, positive sufficient, there’s a sizeable enhance. What’s far more unusual in trendy lenses is that the entrance aspect and actually the entire inside barrel rotates throughout focusing, in addition to extending barely at shorter focus settings. This impairs dealing with, as it’s a must to preserve your fingers away from the main focus ring throughout autofocus. In equity although, the main focus ring is positioned proper on the entrance of the lens so it’s pretty simple to keep away from any unintentional contact. It’s extra of a ache in the event you’re utilizing rotation-specific filters, like a round polarizer, ND grad (Impartial Density, graduated) or starburst filter, because the filter rotates throughout focusing.

The lens options an AF/MF auto/guide focus mode swap, which is one thing I at all times wish to see because it cuts down the time spent rummaging round in digicam menus. Autofocus itself depends on a fundamental electrical ‘DC’ motor, as Canon calls it. It’s usually sluggish and clearly audible in operation, in addition to precluding the opportunity of guide override of autofocus, making that AF/MF swap much more essential. It’s a very long time since I’ve seen a Canon autofocus lens with this fundamental sort of motor, and it’s a really poor relation to all the opposite RF lenses with STM (Stepping Motor), USM (UltraSonic Motor), Nano USM or VCM (Voice Coil Motor) programs.

As anticipated for one among Canon’s low-budget lenses, this one doesn’t characteristic any weather-seals however, in contrast to some, it does no less than have a steel moderately than plastic mounting plate. It’s additionally no shock that the lens is offered with no hood, which just about an important further in my e book. Canon tends to solely embody hoods with its expensive L-series lenses. For the official Canon ET-60 hood, you’ll must shell out a further $30 / £22 / AU$25, or thereabouts. On the plus facet, there’s no less than some resistance to ghosting and flare even within the absence of a hood, due to the applying of Canon’s trusty Tremendous Spectra coating.
Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6: Efficiency
It bears repeating that autofocus is comparatively sluggish and noisy, in contrast with the overwhelming majority of contemporary autofocus lenses made by Canon and different producers. On the plus facet, it’s no less than correct on fairly a constant foundation. On the heart of the picture body, ranges of sharpness are fairly cheap all through many of the zoom vary, solely dropping off on the longest zoom setting. Sharpness within the intermediate space between heart and edge is comparatively lackluster, and extra disappointing out on the edges and corners.

The instance photographs above and under show the extents of the zoom vary. They have been taken from the identical place utilizing the shortest and longest zoom settings respectively.

In sensible phrases, sharpness in handheld taking pictures may very well be improved by optical picture stabilization, which is unfortunately missing within the lens. It’s price taking into consideration that even for cameras that do characteristic IBIS, optical stabilization tends to be more practical when utilizing telephoto lenses.

There’s extra dangerous information in terms of colour fringing. It’s really fairly minimal on the shortest zoom setting however will get worse and worse as you prolong via the zoom vary, being fairly dire within the 200-300mm sector. Fortunately, the automated in-camera correction of EOS R system our bodies can treatment the state of affairs to a big extent.

Higher information is that distortion is just about zero on the shortest zoom setting, though pincushion turns into extra noticeable as you prolong via the zoom vary. Once more, automated in-camera correction is obtainable in EOS R system cameras and, in equity, native distortion is way lower than with very many Canon RF lenses that I’ve examined and which have been via our lab. General although, I’d need to say that efficiency is disappointing.

Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6: Pattern Photos
The next gallery of pattern photographs was taken at Bristol Floating Harbour within the UK on a sunny morning. The pictures have been taken at numerous focal lengths all through the complete zoom vary.
Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6: Lab Outcomes
We run a variety of lab assessments beneath managed situations, utilizing the Imatest Grasp testing suite. Photographs of check charts are taken throughout the vary of apertures and zooms (the place obtainable), then analyzed for sharpness, distortion and chromatic aberrations.
We use Imatest SFR (spatial frequency response) charts and evaluation software program to plot lens decision on the heart of the picture body, corners and mid-point distances, throughout the vary of aperture settings and, with zoom lenses, at 4 completely different focal lengths. The assessments additionally measure distortion and colour fringing (chromatic aberration).
Sharpness:


Sharpness is fairly good on the heart of the picture body in any respect however the very longest zoom setting however quickly begins to drop off as you stray away from the center in direction of the sides. Excessive edge/nook sharpness is downright disappointing.
Fringing:

With out automated in-camera correction, colour fringing is clearly seen at a zoom setting of 135mm and really noticeable at longer focal lengths. It’s notably dangerous within the 200-300mm sector of the zoom vary.
Distortion:

There’s just about no distortion on the shortest focal size of 75mm however pincushion turns into progressively worse as you prolong via the zoom vary to 300mm. Even so, the precise quantities of distortion are moderately lower than with many lenses which might be designed for mirrorless cameras, which rely very closely on automated in-camera correction.
Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6: Verdict
I simply don’t like this lens. Positive, it’s designed to be compact, light-weight and reasonably priced, and sure, it’s all of these issues. It simply seems like a really retrograde step in contrast with each different Canon RF lens I’ve used, and I’ve used most of them. By way of autofocus, dealing with, stabilization (lack of) and picture high quality, I really feel I’ve gone again 25 years to the times of the EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III, which I assumed was a really disappointing lens even then. These days, I’d count on a lot better from an own-brand Canon lens, irrespective of how ‘reasonably priced’ the worth.
|
Options ★★★ |
The autofocus system is relatively sluggish and noisy, and there’s no optical picture stabilization. |
|
Design ★★★ |
The lens feels prefer it’s constructed all the way down to a value. Dealing with is poor with a spotlight ring that rotates throughout autofocus. |
|
Efficiency ★★★ |
Sharpness is fairly respectable on the heart of the picture body however general picture high quality and efficiency are second-rate. |
|
Worth ★★★ |
For a telephoto zoom lens, it’s comparatively low-cost to purchase however I really feel it’s nonetheless not superb worth and the hood prices further. |























