Somebody made a ‘digicam’ that may shoot at two billion frames per second


Brian Haidet, a scientist creating movies on YouTube beneath the deal with AlphaPhoenix, confirmed off a digicam in a brand new video that can seize footage of a laser pointer on the velocity of sunshine. The digicam is an replace on a earlier design that might seize footage at one billion frames per second, but it surely comes with a serious caveat: it could possibly solely shoot one pixel at a time.

Haidet’s digicam is constituted of a gimbal-mounted mirror, two tubes, a easy lens, a light-weight sensor and a few Python code to tie all of it collectively. Pointed at a laser pointer, the digicam’s in a position to seize a beam of sunshine at two billion frames per second, exhibiting it easily touring between mirrors, with speeds that fluctuate relying on the place the digicam is in relation to the laser pointer. “Gentle strikes about six inches, or 15 centimeters, per body of this video,” Haidet says. “This beam of sunshine is touring on the Universe’s velocity restrict. Gentle in any reference body won’t ever transfer any quicker or any slower than this velocity.”

Brian Haidet explaining how he tiled pixels together to create footage of light traveling.

Pixels needed to be tiled collectively to create what appears like regular video footage.

(Brian Hadet)

Whereas it is theoretically potential to create a extra conventional digicam that may seize footage at two billion frames per second, as Haidet explains, you may’t do it with the instruments most individuals have of their storage. His answer was to seize one pixel at a time, after which tile that footage collectively to create one thing viewable. In line with Haidet, “if all these movies are synchronized and we take many, many, many, one pixel movies, we are able to tile these movies subsequent to one another and play all of them again at the very same second and provides one thing that appears like a video.”

Whereas it is not the identical factor as a real two billion frames-per-second digicam, “that is only a considerably costlier technique to do it,” Haidet says, “and it actually would not get us any higher of a consequence.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *