Yesterday, Sony introduced the a7 V – quicker and smarter than the a7 IV, whereas nonetheless sharing a lot of its DNA. The Sony a7 V includes a 33 megapixel partially-stacked sensor, a brand new BIONZ XR2 processor, pre-capture RAW, and extra. Right here’s what it is best to know!
First issues first, let’s take a look at a comparability towards the earlier era Sony a7 IV.
Sony a7 IV vs Sony a7 V Specs Comparability
| Digicam Function | Sony a7 IV | Sony a7 V |
|---|---|---|
| Introduced | October 2021 | December 2025 |
| Digicam Sort | Mirrorless | Mirrorless |
| Sensor Sort | BSI CMOS | Partially Stacked CMOS |
| Picture Processor | BIONZ XR | BIONZ XR2 |
| Decision | 33.0 MP | 33.0 MP |
| Pixel Dimensions | 7008×4672 | 7008×4672 |
| Sensor Dimensions | 35.9 x 23.9 mm (Full Body) | 35.9 x 23.9 mm (Full Body) |
| Sensor Pixel Measurement | 5.12µ | 5.12µ |
| Low Move Filter | No | No |
| IBIS (In-Physique Picture Stabilization) | Sure | Sure |
| Base ISO | ISO 100 | ISO 100 |
| Max Native ISO | ISO 51,200 | ISO 51,200 |
| Prolonged ISOs | ISO 50-204,800 | ISO 50-204,800 |
| Excessive-Decision Sensor Shift | No | Sure* |
| Focus Stack Bracketing | No | No |
| Pre-Shoot Burst Mode | No | Sure |
| Quickest Shutter Pace | 1/8000 | 1/16000 |
| Longest Shutter Pace | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Steady Capturing (Digital Shutter) | 10 FPS | 30 FPS |
| Steady Capturing (Mechanical Shutter) | 10 FPS | 10 FPS |
| Notes for Excessive FPS Capturing | Compressed uncooked at 10 FPS (uncompressed and lossless compressed uncooked at 6 FPS) | None |
| Buffer Measurement (Uncooked) | Limitless | 95 frames at 30 FPS; limitless at 10 FPS |
| Autofocus System | Hybrid PDAF | Hybrid PDAF with deep studying topic recognition |
| Autofocus Factors | 759 | 759 |
| Most Low-Gentle AF Sensitivity (Standardized to f/2, ISO 100) | -4 EV | -4 EV |
| Commonplace Flash Sync Pace | 1/250 | 1/250 |
| Curtain to Defend Sensor at Shutdown | Sure | Sure |
|
Video Options |
||
| Most Video Bit Depth (Inside) | 10 bits | 10 bits |
| Most Video Bit Depth (Exterior) | 10 bits | 10 bits |
| Uncooked Video | No | No |
| Open Gate Recording | No | No |
| 4K Most Framerate | 60 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 1080P Most Framerate | 120 FPS | 240 FPS |
| Extra Video Crop Issue | 1.5x crop at 4K 60p (4K 30p has no further crop) | 1.5x crop at 4K 120p and 1080p 240p (in any other case no further crop) |
| Chroma Subsampling | 4:2:2 | 4:2:2 |
| Video Recording Restrict | No restrict | No restrict |
|
Bodily and Different Options |
||
| Card Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Slot 1 Sort | CFExpress Sort A, or SD (UHS-II) | CFExpress Sort A, or SD (UHS-II) |
| Slot 2 Sort | SD (UHS-II) | SD (UHS-II) |
| Rear LCD Measurement (Diagonal) | 3.0 in | 3.2 in |
| Rear LCD Decision | 1.04 million dots | 2.1 million dots |
| Articulating LCD | Absolutely Articulating | Absolutely Articulating |
| Touchscreen | Sure | Sure |
| Viewfinder | EVF | EVF |
| Viewfinder Magnification | 0.78x | 0.78x |
| Viewfinder Decision | 3.69 million dots | 3.69 million dots |
| Viewfinder Protection | 100% | 100% |
| Voice Memo | No | No |
| Headphone Jack | Sure | Sure |
| Microphone Jack | Sure | Sure |
| Constructed-in Flash | No | No |
| GPS | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Sure | Sure |
| WiFi | Sure | Sure |
| USB Sort | Sort C 3.2 Gen 2 | Sort C 3.2 Gen 2 |
| Battery Sort | NP-FZ100 | NP-FZ100 |
| Battery Life (Viewfinder) | 520 frames | 630 frames |
| Battery Life (Rear LCD) | 580 frames | 750 frames |
| Climate Sealed | Sure | Sure |
| Weight (Physique Solely w/ Battery + Card) | 658 g (1.45 lbs.) | 695 g (1.53 lbs.) |
| Dimensions (LxHxD) | 131 x 96 x 80 mm (5.2 x 3.8 x 3.1″) | 130 x 96 x 82 mm (5.1 x 3.8 x 3.2″) |
|
Value Comparability |
||
| Value, New | $2700
See present worth and gross sales: 🇺🇸 B&H |
$2900
Pre-order: 🇺🇸 B&H |
*Notice: For now, I’m itemizing the Sony a7 V as that includes a high-resolution sensor shift mode. This seems to be unclear, nevertheless. Some web sites, like Petapixel, are reporting that it has this function, however the official Sony specification sheet I used to be supplied says that it doesn’t.
Within the title of this text, I stated that the a7 V is “acquainted however higher,” and possibly you’ll be able to see why. It shares primarily the identical management format and digicam sensor because the earlier era a7 IV (however the truth that the sensor is partially stacked on the a7 V). It has the identical viewfinder and the identical reminiscence card format. Sony a7 IV customers will really feel proper at residence utilizing it.
But, there are some crucial enhancements that make the Sony a7 V a extra spectacular all-around digicam. The large factor is pace – the a7 V has a quicker processor, 30 FPS taking pictures, pre-capture RAW, and higher deep-learning autofocus algorithms. Whereas the Sony a7 IV is already good for wildlife and sports activities images, the a7 V builds upon it in some severe methods.
There are additionally some little issues that make the a7 V a considerate enchancment. The LCD display is bigger and better in decision, whereas tilting in much more methods than that of the a7 IV. The battery life is longer. It has higher slow-motion video. All informed, despite the fact that the pace and processing enhancements will get the headlines, they aren’t the one good modifications that Sony has made.
However the earlier era a7 IV isn’t the one digicam that you just is perhaps evaluating towards. How does the brand new a7 V stack up towards Nikon’s closest competitor, the Z6 III?
Sony a7 V vs Nikon Z6 III Specs Comparability
| Digicam Function | Sony a7 V | Nikon Z6 III |
|---|---|---|
| Introduced | December 2025 | June 2024 |
| Digicam Sort | Mirrorless | Mirrorless |
| Sensor Sort | Partially Stacked CMOS | Partially Stacked CMOS |
| Picture Processor | BIONZ XR2 | EXPEED 7 |
| Decision | 33.0 MP | 24.5 MP |
| Pixel Dimensions | 7008×4672 | 6048×4024 |
| Sensor Dimensions | 35.9 x 23.9 mm (Full Body) | 35.9 x 23.9 mm (Full Body) |
| Sensor Pixel Measurement | 5.12µ | 5.94µ |
| Low Move Filter | No | Sure |
| IBIS (In-Physique Picture Stabilization) | Sure | Sure |
| Base ISO | ISO 100 | ISO 100 |
| Max Native ISO | ISO 51,200 | ISO 64,000 |
| Prolonged ISOs | ISO 50-204,800 | ISO 50-204,800 |
| Excessive-Decision Sensor Shift | Sure* | Sure |
| Focus Stack Bracketing | No | Sure |
| Pre-Shoot Burst Mode | Sure | Sure (JPEG solely) |
| Quickest Shutter Pace | 1/16000 | 1/16000 |
| Longest Shutter Pace | 30 seconds | 900 seconds |
| Steady Capturing (Mechanical Shutter) | 10 FPS | 14 FPS |
| Steady Capturing (Digital Shutter) | 30 FPS | 20 FPS |
| Notes for Excessive FPS Capturing | None | 20 FPS determine is for .NEF information (full-res JPEG at 60 FPS; DX JPEG at 120 FPS) |
| Buffer Measurement (Uncooked) | 95 frames at 30 FPS; limitless at 10 FPS | Over 1000 frames (20 FPS) |
| Autofocus System | Hybrid PDAF with deep studying topic recognition | Hybrid PDAF with deep studying topic recognition |
| Autofocus Factors | 759 | 273 |
| Most Low-Gentle AF Sensitivity (Standardized to f/2, ISO 100) | -4 EV | -8.5 EV |
| Commonplace Flash Sync Pace | 1/250 | 1/200 |
| Curtain to Defend Sensor at Shutdown | Sure | No |
|
Video Options |
||
| Most Video Bit Depth (Inside) | 10 bits | 12 bits |
| Most Video Bit Depth (Exterior) | 10 bits | 12 bits |
| Uncooked Video | No | Sure |
| Open Gate Recording | No | No |
| 6K Most Framerate | N/A | 60 FPS |
| 4K Most Framerate | 120 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 1080P Most Framerate | 240 FPS | 240 FPS |
| Extra Video Crop Issue | 1.5x crop at 4K 120p and 1080p 240p (in any other case no further crop) | 1.5x crop at 4K 120p (4K 60p has no further crop) |
| Chroma Subsampling | 4:2:2 | 4:2:2 |
| Video Recording Restrict | No restrict | 125 min |
|
Bodily and Different Options |
||
| Card Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Slot 1 Sort | CFExpress Sort A, or SD (UHS-II) | CFExpress Sort B |
| Slot 2 Sort | SD (UHS-II) | SD (UHS-II) |
| Rear LCD Measurement (Diagonal) | 3.2 in | 3.2 in |
| Rear LCD Decision | 2.1 million dots | 2.1 million dots |
| Articulating LCD | Absolutely Articulating | Absolutely Articulating |
| Touchscreen | Sure | Sure |
| Viewfinder | EVF | EVF |
| Viewfinder Magnification | 0.78x | 0.8x |
| Viewfinder Decision | 3.69 million dots | 5.76 million dots |
| Viewfinder Protection | 100% | 100% |
| Voice Memo | No | Sure |
| Headphone Jack | Sure | Sure |
| Microphone Jack | Sure | Sure |
| Constructed-in Flash | No | No |
| GPS | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Sure | Sure |
| WiFi | Sure | Sure |
| USB Sort | Sort C 3.2 Gen 2 | Sort C 3.2 Gen 1 |
| Battery Sort | NP-FZ100 | EN-EL15c |
| Battery Life (Viewfinder) | 630 frames | 360 frames |
| Battery Life (Rear LCD) | 750 frames | 390 frames |
| Battery Life (Eco Mode) | N/A | 410 frames |
| Climate Sealed | Sure | Sure |
| Weight (Physique Solely w/ Battery + Card) | 695 g (1.53 lbs.) | 760 g (1.68 lbs.) |
| Dimensions (LxHxD) | 130 x 96 x 82 mm (5.1 x 3.8 x 3.2″) | 139 x 102 x 89 mm (5.5 x 4.0 x 3.5″)1 |
|
Value Comparability |
||
| Value, New | $2900
Pre-order: 🇺🇸 B&H |
$2700
See present worth and gross sales: 🇺🇸 B&H |
| 1The Nikon Z6 III’s official dimensions don’t embody the depth of the protruding viewfinder. To match the everyday requirements at this time, 15mm have been added to the Z6 III’s depth measurement on this desk. | ||
Not dangerous! To my eye, the Nikon Z6 III positively wins in video options, however for stills, I lean towards the a7 V. That’s the results of its greater decision sensor, quicker body fee, and, most of all, pre-capture RAW.
That stated, the Z6 III positively has some tips up its sleeve that maintain it competetive, like a greater low-light autofocus ranking, voice memos, and a higher-resolution EVF. It additionally prices $200 much less. However the winner right here most likely is dependent upon your scenario greater than something.
Lastly, how does the Sony a7 V examine to the Canon EOS R6 Mark III that was simply introduced final month? Let’s have a look:
Sony a7 V vs Canon EOS R6 III Specs Comparability
| Digicam Function | Sony a7 V | Canon EOS R6 III |
|---|---|---|
| Introduced | December 2025 | November 2025 |
| Digicam Sort | Mirrorless | Mirrorless |
| Sensor Sort | Partially Stacked CMOS | CMOS |
| Picture Processor | BIONZ XR2 | DIGIC X |
| Decision | 33.0 MP | 32.5 MP |
| Pixel Dimensions | 7008×4672 | 6960×4640 |
| Sensor Dimensions | 35.9 x 23.9 mm (Full Body) | 35.9 x 23.9 mm (Full Body) |
| Sensor Pixel Measurement | 5.12µ | 5.16µ |
| Low Move Filter | No | Sure |
| IBIS (In-Physique Picture Stabilization) | Sure | Sure |
| Base ISO | ISO 100 | ISO 100 |
| Max Native ISO | ISO 51,200 | ISO 64,000 |
| Prolonged ISOs | ISO 50-204,800 | ISO 50-102,400 |
| Excessive-Decision Sensor Shift | Sure* | No |
| Focus Stack Bracketing | No | Sure |
| Pre-Shoot Burst Mode | Sure | Sure |
| Quickest Shutter Pace | 1/16000 | 1/16000 |
| Longest Shutter Pace | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Steady Capturing (Mechanical Shutter) | 10 FPS | 12 FPS |
| Steady Capturing (Digital Shutter) | 30 FPS | 40 FPS |
| Notes for Excessive FPS Capturing | None | None |
| Buffer Measurement (Uncooked) | 95 frames at 30 FPS; limitless at 10 FPS | 150 frames (40 FPS), 1000+ frames (12 FPS) |
| Autofocus System | Hybrid PDAF with deep studying topic recognition | Hybrid PDAF |
| Autofocus Factors | 759 | 1053 |
| Most Low-Gentle AF Sensitivity (Standardized to f/2, ISO 100) | -4 EV | -5 EV |
| Commonplace Flash Sync Pace | 1/250 | 1/250 |
| Curtain to Defend Sensor at Shutdown | Sure | Sure |
|
Video Options |
||
| Most Video Bit Depth (Inside) | 10 bits | 12 bits |
| Most Video Bit Depth (Exterior) | 10 bits | 12 bits |
| Uncooked Video | No | Sure |
| Open Gate Recording | No | Sure (as much as 7K 30p uncooked) |
| 7K Most Framerate | N/A | 60 FPS |
| 4K Most Framerate | 120 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 1080P Most Framerate | 240 FPS | 180 FPS |
| Extra Video Crop Issue | 1.5x crop at 4K 120p and 1080p 240p (in any other case no further crop) | No |
| Chroma Subsampling | 4:2:2 | 4:2:2 |
| Video Recording Restrict | No restrict | No restrict |
|
Bodily and Different Options |
||
| Card Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Slot 1 Sort | CFExpress Sort A, or SD (UHS-II) | CFExpress Sort B |
| Slot 2 Sort | SD (UHS-II) | SD (UHS-II) |
| Rear LCD Measurement (Diagonal) | 3.2 in | 3.0 in |
| Rear LCD Decision | 2.1 million dots | 1.62 million dots |
| Articulating LCD | Absolutely Articulating | Absolutely Articulating |
| Touchscreen | Sure | Sure |
| Viewfinder | EVF | EVF |
| Viewfinder Magnification | 0.78x | 0.76x |
| Viewfinder Decision | 3.69 million dots | 3.69 million dots |
| Viewfinder Protection | 100% | 100% |
| Voice Memo | No | No |
| Headphone Jack | Sure | Sure |
| Microphone Jack | Sure | Sure |
| Constructed-in Flash | No | No |
| GPS | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Sure | Sure |
| WiFi | Sure | Sure |
| USB Sort | Sort C 3.2 Gen 2 | Sort C 3.2 Gen 2 |
| Battery Sort | NP-FZ100 | LP-E6P |
| Battery Life (Viewfinder) | 630 frames | 270 frames |
| Battery Life (Rear LCD) | 750 frames | 510 frames |
| Battery Life (Eco Mode) | N/A | 620 frames |
| Climate Sealed | Sure | Sure |
| Weight (Physique Solely w/ Battery + Card) | 695 g (1.53 lbs.) | 699 g (1.54 lbs.) |
| Dimensions (LxHxD) | 130 x 96 x 82 mm (5.1 x 3.8 x 3.2″) | 138 x 98 x 88 mm (5.4 x 3.8 x 3.5″) |
|
Value Comparability |
||
| Value, New | $2900
Pre-order: 🇺🇸 B&H |
$2800
See present worth and gross sales: 🇺🇸 B&H |
I believe this one leans in Canon’s route. Actually for video, the EOS R6 Mark III has higher options and specs, together with open gate and RAW video recording. The Canon additionally wins in pace and buffer capability. I like that the Sony’s battery life is a lot longer, and if it’s true that it has high-resolution sensor shift, that’s a pleasant level in its favor. However at the least on paper, the EOS R6 Mark III appears to be like to have the benefit, particularly contemplating that it’s additionally $100 inexpensive.
Conclusion
Sony’s new a7 V is a transparent enchancment over the Sony a7 IV from 2021, particularly the place pace is anxious. And I’m very to check out how the improved autofocus system and BIONZ XR2 mix to assist sports activities and wildlife photographers get the shot.
On the similar time, it strikes me that the Sony a7 V has some powerful competitors. The Nikon Z6 III and Canon EOS R6 Mark III each beat it the place video options are involved, and I’d say the Canon is forward for stills, too, regardless of costing rather less. That might not be related in case you’re a Sony shooter through-and-through, however in case you’re making an attempt to resolve between the totally different manufacturers, it’s a unique story.
In any case, I sit up for testing the Sony a7 V as soon as we get a replica! Let me know if in case you have any questions on this new digicam, and I’ll do my greatest to reply.






